|
AIPM
Information Resource Centre |
|
|
Issue
4: April 2002 |
|
|
Doc.
No: |
4/02
- 1 |
|
Title: |
A Guide to the Project Management Body Of Knowledge 1996 vs 2000 - What's Changed? |
|
Authors: |
Duncan, Bill |
|
Citation: |
PMForum |
|
Location: |
http://www.pmforum.org/library/papers/duncanonpmbok2000.htm |
|
The purpose of
this article is to document and comment on the differences between the
1996 edition and the 2000 edition of the PMBOK. |
|
|
Doc.
No: |
4/02
- 2 |
|
Title: |
Financial Engineering in Project Management |
|
Authors: |
Farrell, Michael |
|
Citation: |
Project Management Journal V33(1) March 2002:pp.27-36 |
|
Location: |
Available from the AIPM Information Resource Centre |
|
The recent
development of a new science of risk management, called financial
engineering has dramatically altered the traditional logic used by
financial decision-makers to assess the risk-return characteristics of a
wide variety of investment assets and led to the emergence of the new
profession of financial engineer. An effect of the application of recent
discoveries in mathematics and computer science to the analysis of
financial markets, financial engineering is based on the assumption of
an interconnected financial universe composed of the fundamental
building blocks - cash flows, the corresponding probability
distributions, and payment dates. Using the techniques of financial
engineering, the financial engineer/financial decision-maker can reduce
even the most complex policy issues of concern, such as capital
budgeting, asset allocation and investment management, arbitrage,
hedging and financial risk management, to a portfolio composed of these
three basic components. |
|
|
Doc.
No: |
4/02 - 3 |
|
Title: |
The 20 Keys to Project Management Recruitment |
| Authors: | Price, Martin |
| Citation: | Project V14 (10) April 2002: pp.: 20 - 21 |
|
Location: |
Available from the AIPM Information Centre |
|
How
do employers find the right person for the job? The author suggests that
first they need to understand the project management role and the
abilities required in order to raise the reliability and value of
project management appointments. The 20 Keys is a methodology
developed to help manage the recruitment and aspirations of project
professionals and does not conform to any model of 'competency'. |
|
|
Doc.
No: |
4/02 - 4 |
|
Title: |
Construction Total Project Management Planning Issues |
|
Authors: |
Yates, Janet K.; Eskander, Adel |
|
Citation: |
Project Management Journal V33(1) March 2002:pp. 37 - 48 |
|
Location: |
Available from the AIPM Information Centre |
|
|
|
|
Doc.
No: |
4/02
- 5 |
|
Title: |
Project Success Criteria |
|
Authors: |
Turner, Rodney |
|
Citation |
Project V14 (10) April 2002: pp.: 20 - 21 |
|
Location: |
Available from the AIPM Information Resource Centre |
|
Project success is
a critical issue for project managers and one factor determines project
success above all others: agree the success criteria with all the
stakeholders before you start. This article looks at the three key
elements for success, the criteria, KPI's, success factors and project
strategy. |
|
|
Doc.
No: |
4/02
- 6 |
|
Title: |
Modeling a Supply Chain |
|
Authors: |
Breskin, Ira |
|
Citation: |
PM Network, V16(4)April 2002:pp44 - 48 |
|
Location: |
Available from the AIPM Information Resource Centre |
|
Supply
chain design improvement usually starts with reconfiguring the outbound
link to customers. Improving links to customers pays immediate benefits
such as reduced costs and better service which drive higher sales and
profits. Revamping the outbound distribution is usually cheaper than
addressing more complex issues. Global supply chain set ups can be aided
by software packages that provide product sourcing, comparative
contractor capability data, trade logistics, and transit times. The
Supply-Chain Operation Reference (SCOR) model is a detailed template
which helps manufacturers design a supply chain, measure it against
industry specific goals, and improve it over time. Includes illustrative
material. |
|
|
Doc.
No: |
4/02 - 7 |
|
Title: |
Priority Decisions. While senior executives shouldn't concern themselves with the project nitty-gritty, portfolio management enables strategic value judgments |
|
Authors: |
Foti, R. |
|
Citation: |
PM Network, V16(4)April 2002:pp 24-29 |
|
Location: |
Available from the AIPM Information Resource Centre |
|
A
portfolio management system enables businesses to maximize their
resources while allowing them to achieve their strategic purpose.
Effective portfolio management is pushed by three main components -
organizational platform, energetic leadership, and enabled processes. In
addition, there are three types of project portfolios - compliance,
operational, and value-creating. The organization's strategic plan is
the basis for the effective prioritisation of projects which must be
ranked on value and balance. Some scoring models used to rank project
portfolios are Net Present Value (NPV), Expected Commercial Value (ECV),
and Productivity Index (PI). Includes illustrative material. |
|
|
OBTAINING
COPIES OF CITED REFERENCES AND CONTACT DETAILS |
|
|
|
|